Blog Wars

While this whole Blog Wars thing is hilariously controversial and therefore seemingly interesting, it's dissapointing to find that at the bottom of it every argument seems to root itself on something like "you delete comments", "no I don't", "yeah you did", "prove it".

I have read most of the bloggerheads posts, and he points out a lot of very true things, Iain Dale is a bit of a liar (though I honestly expected something better than "He might have called me something, but he said he didn't"), he edited his wikipedia page then said he didn't (who hasn't done that), Guido Fawkes is a fairly dishonest tabloid hack kind of blogger (not that shocking). This seems like an example of when someone is obviously being an idiot, it's best to ignore them and hope everyone else will realise? Obviously point out the faults, but maybe don't make every blog post about it for a month.

I'm not saying Tim Ireland isn't a legend, but having read his blog for years it's a bit dissapointing to see all this bickering going on for so long. Also setting up a parody blog and following every mention of the name Iain Dale with "(liar)" seems to be taking it a little too far?